Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Volume 7, Issue 4 , Pages 246-249, October 2006

Effective prevention of massive periprocedural embolism during renal artery stenting

  • Paolo Cardaioli

      Affiliations

    • Interventional Cardiology Unit, Division of Cardiology, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
  • ,
  • Gianluca Rigatelli

      Affiliations

    • Interventional Cardiology Unit, Division of Cardiology, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Interventional Cardiology Unit, Division of Cardiology, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy. Tel.: +39 044220164; fax: +39 044220164
  • ,
  • Massimo Giordan

      Affiliations

    • Interventional Cardiology Unit, Division of Cardiology, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
  • ,
  • Michele Piva

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nephrology, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
  • ,
  • Loris Roncon

      Affiliations

    • Interventional Cardiology Unit, Division of Cardiology, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
  • ,
  • Pietro Zonzin

      Affiliations

    • Interventional Cardiology Unit, Division of Cardiology, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
  • ,
  • Enzo Bianchini

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
  • ,
  • Domenico Rubello

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Medicine Service-PET Unit, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy

Received 2 January 2006; received in revised form 31 January 2006; accepted 31 January 2006.

Abstract 

We report the case of a massive embolism of atheromatous material during stenting of a tight renal artery stenosis, which was prevented by using a distal embolic protection device and aggressive aspiration of the blood through a guiding catheter. A 72-year-old man who was referred to our institution for coronary artery disease treated with coronary angioplasty underwent renal angiography which revealed a tight stenosis (99%) located at the ostium of the right renal artery extending for 15 mm into the main tract. The diameter of the artery was estimated to be 5.5 cm in the main tract, and the plaque had a soft appearance complicated by the presence of a thrombus (persistence of contrast agent in the plaque on selective renal angiography). Renal artery Doppler ultrasound and renal scintigraphy confirmed the need for renal revascularization. An embolus protection device (FilterWire EZ, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) was successfully opened distally to the stenosis after gentle predilation. After stent deployment (Genesis 5.5×18 mm, Cordis, J&J Medical, Miami Lakes, FL, USA), aggressive aspiration of the blood through the guiding catheter was performed. A large amount of embolic material with macroscopic particles was retrieved into the basket of the embolic protection device and in the blood aspirated with the guiding catheter. Good functional results were obtained on Doppler analysis of intrarenal blood flow, with a resistive index of 70. Despite the fact that the extensive use of embolic protection devices in renal artery stenting is still under discussion, this technique may be advisable in selected cases with favorable anatomy and high embolic risk, especially in patients with complex and hazy lesions.

Keywords: Massive embolism, Renal artery stenting, Embolic protection device

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1553-8389(06)00006-6

doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2006.01.005

Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Volume 7, Issue 4 , Pages 246-249, October 2006